State Records Committee Appeal Decision 2018-05


EVAN JOHNSON, Petitioner, v.

SANDY CITY, Respondent.


Case No. 18-05

By this appeal, Petitioner, Evan Johnson, seeks access to records held by Respondent, Sandy City.


On or about November 8, 2017, Mr. Johnson made a request for records pursuant to the Government Records Access and Management Act (“GRAMA”). Mr. Johnson requested, “legal and PR invoices for the time period of Jan 1, 2016 to present.” On the Utah Government Record Request Form, Mr. Johnson checked the box that stated, “I understand I may be responsible for fees associated with copying charges or research charges” and authorized costs up to $100.00. Mr. Johnson also checked the box that stated that he was “requesting a waiver of copy costs.” In a letter dated November 21, 2017, the City Recorder for Respondent notified Petitioner that there were no records available for the PR invoices, but would provide the remaining requested records after paying a deposit of $80.00.

Petitioner filed an appeal to Scott Bond, Chief Administrative Officer for Respondent. In a letter dated December 15, 2017, Mr. Bond affirmed the decision of the City Recorder. Petitioner was unsatisfied with the amount of the fee and filed an appeal with the State Records Committee (“Committee”). The Committee having reviewed the arguments submitted by the parties and having heard oral argument and testimony on February 8, 2018, now issues the following Decision and Order.


1. A governmental entity may charge a reasonable fee to cover the governmental entity’s actual cost of providing a record. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(1). Actual costs may include the cost of staff time searching, retrieving, and other direct administrative costs complying with the request. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(2)(a)(ii). An hourly charge may not exceed the salary of the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill and training to perform the request. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(2)(b). Additionally, no charge may be made for the first quarter hour of staff time. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(2)(c).

2. GRAMA specifies that a governmental entity “may fulfill a record request without charge” and is encouraged to do so when it determines that: (1) Releasing the record primarily benefits the public rather than a person; (2) The individual requesting the record is the subject of the record, or an individual specified in Subsection 63G-2-202(1) or (2); or (3) The requester’s legal rights are directly implicated by the information in the record, and the requester is impecunious. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(4)(a-c).

3. A person who believes that there has been an unreasonable denial of a fee waiver under Utah Code § 63G-2-203(4) may appeal the denial in the same manner as a person appeals when inspection of a public record is denied under Utah Code § 63G-2-205. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(6)(a). The adjudicative body hearing the appeal shall review the fee waiver de novo, but shall review and consider the governmental entity’s denial of the fee and any determination under Utah Code § 63G-2-203(4)(a-c). Utah Code § 63G-2-203(6)(b)(i). Additionally, the adjudicative body has the same authority when a fee waiver or reduction is denied as it has when the inspection of a public record is denied. Utah Code § 63G-2-203(6)(b)(ii).

4. Mr. Johnson argued that he believed the fee being charged by Respondent was unreasonable. However, the Committee does not have the authority to determine the “reasonableness” of a fee charged by a governmental entity. Instead, the Committee has the authority pursuant to Utah Code § 63G-2-203(6)(a) to determine whether “there has been an unreasonable denial of a fee waiver.”

5. After reviewing the arguments submitted by the parties, and hearing oral arguments and testimony, the Committee finds that Respondent did not unreasonably deny Mr. Johnson’s request for a fee waiver.


THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the appeal of Petitioner, Evan Johnson, is DENIED.


A party to a proceeding before the Committee may seek judicial review in District Court of a Committee's Order by filing a petition for review of the Committee Order as provided in Utah Code § 63G-2-404. Utah Code § 63G-2-403(14). A petition for judicial review of a Committee Order "shall be filed no later than 30 days" after the date of the Committee Order. Utah Code § 63G-2-404(1)(a). The petition for judicial review must be a complaint which is governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, and include the Committee as a necessary party and contain the required information listed in Subsection -404(2). Utah Code § 63G-2-404(1) & (2). The court shall make its decision de novo, but shall allow introduction of evidence presented to the Committee, determine all questions of fact and law without a jury, and decide the issue at the earliest practical opportunity. Utah Code § 63G-2-404(6). In order to protect a parties’ rights on appeal, a party may wish to seek advice from an attorney.


Pursuant to Utah Code § 63G-2-403(15)(c), if the Committee orders the governmental entity to produce a record and no appeal is filed, the government entity herein shall comply with the order of the Committee and shall: (1) Produce the record; and (2) File a notice of compliance with the Committee. If the governmental entity ordered to produce a record fails to file a notice of compliance or a notice of intent to appeal, the Committee may do either or both of the following: (1) Impose a civil penalty of up to $500 for each day of continuing noncompliance; or (2) Send written notice of the entity's noncompliance to the Governor for executive branch entities, to the Legislative Management Committee for legislative branch entities, and to the Judicial Council for judicial branch agencies’ entities. Utah Code § 63G-2-403(15)(d)(i). In imposing a civil penalty, the Committee shall consider the gravity and circumstances of the violation, including whether the failure to comply was due to neglect or was willful or intentional. Utah Code § 63G-2-403(15)(d)(ii).

Entered this 20th day of February 2018.


DAVID FLEMING, Chairperson
State Records Committee


Page Last Updated February 21, 2018 .